Food Scarcity and Aid Distribution

Phillip’s article discusses the “semiotics of food in Tanzanian politics.” Food is available to Tanzanians through several processes. Phillips explains that “food of wealth” is associated with political reciprocity, while “food of the farm” is associated with reciprocity among group members. The resulting relationships are gendered; women control “food of the farm” and men control “food of wealth.” This power dynamic creates familial relationships that leave women largely responsible for the nutrition of their children. Singidans also receive food through the distribution of food aid by their government. The politics that dictate who receives this food aid is differentiated among economic groups where the poorest families often receive the majority of the aid. As a result, families that fall in the middle and are still plagued by hunger often go without aid.

Water as a scare resource.

Diarrheal disease, malnutrition, and dehydration are intrinsically related problems and coupled with a drought create a situation of vulnerability. The linked article discusses the relationship of international food prices to hunger. http://blog.bread.org/2008/04/index.html

Samantha Nelson

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s